mgt611 GDB Idea solution

Scenario…………

There is a company named; JJ & Co registered under company’s ordinance 1984. Its memorandum of association asserts absolute compliance with all the clauses & sections of company’s ordinance 1984. In some instances; for the sake of profitability and smooth functioning of company’s affaires; Management takes decisions totally by passing the memorandum of association.



Question No. 1

Can it be concluded that company is legal?

Question No. 2

Can court of law wind up the business of JJ & company?




A company can alter its memorandum

1-To carry on its business more economically or more efficiently or

2- to attain its main perpose by new or improved means; or

3- to enlarge or change the local area of its operations;

4-to carry on some business,not being a business specified in its memorandum

5-to sale or dispose or the whole or any part of the undertaking of the company

So according to these allowed alteration scheme described above which is part of company’s ordinance 1984 if management of company named JJ&CO takes decisions remaining in the limits of these features. Than

Qno1

Solution: So according to these allowed alteration scheme described above which is part of company’s ordinance 1984 if management of company named JJ&CO takes decisions remaining in the limits of these features.

Conclusion :

yes it is legal

Qno2

Solution: No court of Law will never wind up the business of JJ & Company’s

But if company takes some illegal way to make profit crossing the limits described above than court of law will take serious steps to give punishment like fine or suspending of thoses employees or top managers who ll b involved in this.
Solution # 2 :-

Type of Conflict:-
In this situation competitive conflict (win-lose) will arise as staff demands more bonuses after they claim increase in the sales and management is not prepared to announce more bonuses.
Afteraffects:
A competitive process will most likely have the following effects on the parties:
Communication is obstructed as the conflicting parties try to gain advantage by misleading each other through false promises and misinformation. Communication is ultimately reduced as the parties realize they cannot trust one another's communications as honest and informative.

"Obstructiveness and lack of helpfulness lead to mutual negative attitudes and suspicion of one another's intentions. One's perceptions of the other tend to focus on the person's negative qualities and ignore the positives."
The parties are unable to effectively divide their work and end up duplicating efforts. When they do divide it, they continuously feel the need to check each other's work.

Ongoing disagreement and critical rejection of ideas reduces participants' self-confidence as well as confidence in the other parties.

The conflicting parties seek to increase their own power and therefore see any increase in the other side's power as a threat.

The competitive process fosters the notion that the solution of the conflict can only be imposed by one side on the other. This orientation also encourages the use of coercive tactics such as psychological or physical threats and/or violence. This process tends to expand the range of contested issues and turns the conflict into a power struggle, with each side seeking to win outright. This sort of escalation raises the motivational significance of the conflict for the participants and makes them more likely to accept a mutual disaster rather than a partial defeat or compromise.